Files
mnote/.codex/reasonix-tasks/2026-05-25-batch-i-worker-b-3-20-filetree-dom-runtime-readonly.md
T

1.8 KiB

Batch I Worker B: 3-20 filetree DOM runtime read-only audit

Project root: /mnt/Data1T/mnote-worktrees/0525-i-worker-b-3-20-filetree-dom-runtime-readonly

You are a read-only audit worker. Do not modify files, do not run formatters that write files, do not commit, and do not clean unrelated files.

Goal

Audit the next smallest safe extraction boundary for filetree DOM runtime helpers after the existing upload/runtime splits.

Focus only on:

  • refreshLocalFolderSidebarSnapshot
  • appendUploadedAssetRow
  • revealFileTreeRow
  • revealFileTreeAssetRow
  • any existing helper already in rust/crates/mnote-web/browser/filetree-runtime.js

Questions to answer

  1. Which part, if any, can move to filetree-runtime.js without moving API fetch, source ownership, or full shell orchestration?
  2. Is appendUploadedAssetRow safe to split into a pure row builder plus inline shell insertion, or should it stay in layout.rs for now?
  3. Is refreshLocalFolderSidebarSnapshot safe to delegate rendering/apply steps to runtime, or should fetch/render coupling remain inline?
  4. What exact function signature and allowed files should Codex use for the next implementation slice?
  5. What tests/smoke should Codex run after the implementation?

Required checks

Run only read-only commands:

git status --short
node --check rust/crates/mnote-web/browser/filetree-runtime.js
cargo check --manifest-path rust/Cargo.toml -p mnote-web

If a command is blocked by environment or lock contention, record the exact reason.

Required output

  • modified_files: must be []
  • recommended extraction slice or explicit "do not extract yet"
  • files/functions inspected
  • verification commands and results
  • risks / do-not-move list
  • process-handoff.md, process-handoff.json, result.json, and final.md through the runner